Industrial
Seeing the bigger picture

Industrial
Industries
For industrial automation and robotics, manufacturing software and digital twins, industrial IoT and machine connectivity, predictive maintenance and asset performance, additive manufacturing, industrial AI and computer vision, OT cybersecurity, and the supply-chain and intralogistics technology that runs across them.

We tend to come in once the engineering case is settled and the next stage of growth turns on choices the company has not had to make before.
Three key challenges shaping the coming years
Three concerns keep coming up in the leadership conversations that matter across European Industrial right now, framed differently depending on the sub-segment but pointing at the same underlying conditions.

A robotics or AMR CEO frames it as what their channel looks like when Siemens, ABB and Rockwell are opening their marketplaces and acquiring the software layer above. An MES or industrial-AI founder frames it as how to get past pilot purgatory when the buyer is asking for closed-loop outcomes in the brownfield rather than another dashboard. A German-headquartered scale-up CEO frames it as where the next twenty per cent of growth comes from when the home market is in its fourth year of softening.

Taken together, they sketch the same commercial environment from three angles: a stack that is at once channel, competitor and acquirer; a buyer who has lost patience with pilots and dashboards; and a home market whose order book has not really recovered.
01. Co-existing with the stack
Siemens Xcelerator lists more than 700 certified sellers and 4,000-plus integration partners; Schneider Electric reported €40 billion of revenue and 12% ARR growth at Aveva for FY25; and IoT Analytics' 2025 dataset shows that 45% of 4,000-plus global automation projects are Siemens-led. The same incumbents are simultaneously rolling up the layer above hardware: Siemens closed its $10 billion acquisition of Altair in October 2024, Emerson tendered for the rest of AspenTech at a roughly $15 billion enterprise value the same month, and Schneider has fully absorbed Aveva.

iFactory's 2025 SPS analysis put the buyer's perspective bluntly: choosing a PLC brand commits a facility to that vendor's software, drives, HMIs and spare parts for ten to fifteen years. The platform now sits in three positions at once: a distribution channel for mid-market deals, a head-to-head competitor (Senseye in predictive maintenance, Industrial Copilot in MES, OmniCore in robotics), and a likely acquirer for the most differentiated software-led scale-ups. The companies that look most likely to thrive over the next two years tend to be either marketplace-native and OPC UA-federated, or already in conversation about an exit into one of the incumbents.
02. Industrial-grade, brownfield-ready, outcome-priced
Cedrik Neike of Siemens framed the bar at the AI with Purpose Summit 2025: industry needs multimodal industrial-grade foundation models built around the way machines, workflows and real-world constraints actually behave, not another dashboard. IBM's much-cited figure, repeated at IIoT World Manufacturing Day 2025 and on most conference stages since, is that around 90% of industrial data collected goes unused.

The buyer's bar has hardened to a triple test: industrial-grade reliability under IEC 62443 cyber, brownfield-ready against an existing Siemens, Rockwell, Aveva and SAP fleet, and decision-grade rather than visualisation-grade. Augury sells the result on a Guaranteed Diagnostics contract, Cognite's December 2025 Atlas AI release puts agentic outcomes inside customers like Aker BP and TotalEnergies, and Symbotic posted its first profitable fiscal year (FY25 EPS $1.02, $22 billion backlog) on a warehouse-as-a-service model.

Robots-as-a-service is now the language of every new RFP: the IFR projects the segment from $16 billion in 2025 to roughly $125 billion by 2034, with KUKA, ABB, Locus and Symbotic's GreenBox JV with SoftBank reorganising commercial models around it.
03. When the order book goes quiet
VDMA closed 2025 with mechanical-engineering orders flat in real terms after three consecutive years of decline, and the HCOB Germany Manufacturing PMI ended December 2025 at a 10-month low of 47.0, with exports falling for a fifth consecutive month. The Eurozone Manufacturing PMI sat at 48.8 in the same month, a 9-month low.

The macro setting is unusually direct: Trump's Section 232 tariffs were raised to 50% on steel and aluminium in June 2025 and extended to derivative goods including machinery in August, Mario Draghi's September 2024 competitiveness report registered around 11% of its recommendations fully implemented a year later (per the European Policy Innovation Council), and Bosch, ZF, Continental, Volkswagen and BASF all announced restructuring or plant closures across 2024 and 2025.

Hannover Messe 2026 introduced a dedicated Defence Manufacturing Area for the first time as German machinery suppliers pivoted away from civilian-demand softness, a category most positive-tech companies cannot follow.

The counter-cyclical exception worth watching is Neura Robotics, which closed a €120 million Series B in January 2025, was reported in March 2026 to be raising roughly €1 billion at a €4 billion valuation, and is anchored by a Schaeffler commitment to deploy a mid-four-digit number of humanoids by 2035.
In European Industrial, the question shifts gradually as a company moves from product-validation to commercial scale. The technology has usually been proven somewhere: a Mittelstand line in Baden-Württemberg, a Tier 1 plant in Lyon or Turin, a chemical site in the Netherlands or Norway, sometimes over years. What changes is the audience. The next deals are with corporate procurement teams running brownfield audits, with platform-incumbent partner managers asking whether the company will sit inside Xcelerator or EcoStruxure or stand outside, and with CFOs treating capex with much more scepticism than they did in 2022. None of those conversations turn primarily on the engineering.

What separates the companies that cross cleanly into commercial maturity from those that get stuck tends to be organisational rather than technical. Becoming credible inside an Xcelerator or EcoStruxure marketplace is a multi-quarter integration effort with its own product, partner-management and certification load; pricing for outcomes rather than equipment-and-licence requires a service organisation, customer-success function and guarantee structure most hardware-led companies have never built; and rebalancing pipeline away from a softening Mittelstand toward US, MENA and APAC accounts is a sales-and-operations rebuild. Each is a serious organisational shift on its own, and together they tend to require a company to look quite different from the engineering-led growth story it has been telling investors.

Our work in this sector typically begins where two of those organisational shifts are already in motion and the leadership team is trying to sequence them without breaking the existing business. These engagements tend to run over horizons long enough for a platform-marketplace integration to mature, an outcome-based contract to read out across renewal cycles, or a geographic rebalance to start showing in pipeline coverage. The opening question that tends to be most useful is where the next ceiling on growth is closest to forming, more than which feature ships next.
Where the work happens

Interconnectivity
Understanding how Postive Tech sectors connect

The Interconnectivity Series
Drawing Cross-Industries Learnings

Interconnectivity is our long-form series on how the sectors we work in connect with each other and what is actually shaping each of them right now. The most recent edition is The Age of Transformative & Positive Technology.
Other industries

Whether you're establishing a new techology or scaling through an inflection point.
We’d love to hear from you.